Could do better

What are your development goals for this year? Assuming that you have some development goals, I’d like to ask you another question: How did you decide on those goals?

Hands up if you assessed your capabilities across the whole range of your responsibilities before setting goals. Or maybe you did that in conjunction with your line manager, coach or mentor. I think that’s a good start.

Have a look at what you’re expected to deliver and gauge how easy it is for you to do that. Identify your skills, strengths and – um… are we allowed to call them ‘weaknesses’? Or do you call them
‘areas for development’?

This is where it gets interesting. If you call those aspects of the work that you’re not so good at ‘areas for development’ you’re almost bound to then set development goals to address those shortcomings, aren’t you? It would seem strange to identify ‘areas for development’ and then set development goals that ignored them.

Now, think about this: if you have a limited amount of time and money to spend on your development is it better to develop your strengths so that you become truly outstanding in a specific area? Or is it better to spend your limited time and money working at something you have no aptitude for?

Your answer to that question will depend on whether you (or your boss, HR partner or coach) are working towards a vision of you as a specialist or a generalist. Or whether you aspire to a qualification. Most vocational qualifications require demonstration of competence across the full range of relevant skills. Some allow a degree of specialisation, but not all.

Most corporate appraisal systems assume that the process will identify weaknesses and work on them. In effect, they seek to create an organisation full of generalists.

Transferable skills! I hear somebody shout. But what about experts? What about specialists? What about honing your skills to a level of mastery in a small number of areas instead of trying to be equally good at everything?

I can’t help thinking that an enormous amount of time and money is wasted on people attempting to develop skills and capabilities that don’t come naturally and don’t appeal to them as a learner.

And as the Learning and Development profession worldwide prepares to excommunicate me, I’d like to put forward a different philosophy:

  • What if we encouraged people to develop the skills that come naturally and the activities that they enjoy?
  • What if we encouraged people to do more of what they’re good at instead of wasting their time and effort trying to address their ‘weaknesses’?
  • What if we also showed everyone how to work in teams so that the team demonstrated the full range of capabilities even though the individuals within the team specialised, or even excelled, in a few areas?

Now, I realise that this is an idealist philosophy. I know that there are times when some of us have to carry out tasks that we don’t find easy or don’t much enjoy.

But instead of regarding that as an unalterable state of affairs, why not make the development goal focus on how to delegate that task rather than master it?

At the very least, let’s balance up the development that address weaknesses with some that also build on existing strengths and aim towards mastery. Otherwise, we’re spending our training budgets to foster mediocrity.

Personally, I’d rather see people develop into their own talents instead of focusing on their shortcomings. I’d like to see everyone have the opportunity to shine.

What do you think? Let me know…

The SCARF Model

Almost everything that is currently known about the way the human brain works was discovered in the past ten years. Recent advances in research have overturned old models of neurological operation and revolutionised the way we view our brains.

For example, in the 1980s it was believed that each person was born with a finite quota of brain cells which gradually died away over a lifetime, with no new cells being created to replace the ones that were lost. This suggested that damage to the brain could not be repaired. It is now known that the brain does renew cells and that a damaged brain can regenerate itself.

Neuroscience is the scientific study of the nervous system – the brain, spinal column, neurons and the senses. It’s not a new science, psychologists, physiologists and biochemists have long been interested in the nervous system. What is new, is the rapid pace of new discoveries in this area and the consequent application of this knowledge to everyday life.

Having practised NLP for more than 20 years, I’m really excited to see neuroscience turning up scientific evidence to support some of the principles of NLP and to explain what is going on at a neurological level when we use NLP approaches in everyday situations.

Here’s an example:

David Rock (CEO of Results Coaching International) developed a model, known as the SCARF model, which describes the social concerns that drive human behaviour:

  • Status: Our relative importance to others
  • Certainty: Our being able to predict the future
  • Autonomy: Our sense of control over events
  • Relatedness: Our sense of safety with others
  • Fairness: Our perception of fair exchanges between people

Most leaders, managers, HR professionals, trainers, coaches and consultants would look at that model and agree – on the basis of experience. Could any of them PROVE it was true? Probably not. But David Rock, having delved in to the relevant neuroscience, can prove it:

Firstly, the major organising principle of the brain is to minimise threat and maximise reward.

This means the brain is constantly (five times per second) scanning the environment for stimuli that may lead to either threat or reward.

Stimuli associated with positive emotions and reward will trigger an approach response; stimuli associated with negative emotions and experiences will be seen as a threat and trigger an avoid response.

These responses are not purely mental or behavioural. Data gathered through measures of brain activity (such as MRI or EEG) show that threats to any of the social concerns listed above trigger physiological response in the same way as a physical threat. The same neural responses that drive us toward food or away from predators are triggered by our perceptions of the way we are treated by other people.

Being ostracised, for example, activates similar neural responses to being hungry. Threats to our status elevate the level of cortisol, which is also associated with sleep deprivation and chronic anxiety. In MRI tests, lack of clarity and unpredictability light up the same areas in the brain as physical pain.

There are also different behavioural and psychological consequences associated with threat and reward:

Threat leads to:

  • Reduced working memory
  • Narrower field of view
  • Generalising of threat
  • Greater pessimism

Reward leads to:

  • Greater cognitive resources
  • More insights
  • Increased ideas for action
  • Fewer perceptual errors
  • Wider field of view

Clearly, if you deal with people at work, especially if you’re a leader or manager, it’s in everyone’s interests to keep your people in the ‘reward’ frame of mind and away from the perception of threat.

In NLP terms, this relates to Towards and Away From styles of motivation.  We know that both approaches can motivate a person to undertake a particular task and we can determine which a person a using at a given moment by paying attention to their language and behaviour.

We also encourage people to improve their Towards motivation by using the Well-formed Outcomes pattern.  This creates clarity and energy – not to mention certainty! – in relation to a particular goal or activity.

So, the combination of the neuroscience, NLP and the SCARF model lead to some practical principles for better leadership:

Status

At work, a person’s status is determined relative to others around them. It can be increased by praise, recognition, promotion, giving responsibility and sharing important information. It can be diminished by criticism, failure and exclusion from meetings or conversations. It can also be diminished by the successes of colleagues with whom the individual does not enjoy a good relationship.

When a person’s status is threatened by being left out it activates the parts of the brain involved in the perception of physical pain. This may be the reason why it’s quite common for a person to develop back pain when something goes wrong at work.

Clearly, leaders will only avoid triggering the threat response if they pay attention to maintaining each person’s status in ways that are constructive for the whole team. Bear in mind, individuals who feel their status is threatened may start indulging in behaviour that undermines their colleagues, thereby rebuilding their perception of their own status.

You can support and increase the status of every member of your team if you regularly give positive feedback, keep everyone informed and involved and consult them often.

Certainty

Very few people actually believe they can predict the future, but “the best way to predict the future is to create it” (Abraham Lincoln). This means having clear goals, strategy and plans AND telling your team about them.  Certainty is also created through routine.  If you always hold a team meeting on Monday at 2pm and you always send out a team update on Thursday at 10am, people have some certainty to hang on to.

Uncertainty impairs the function of the orbital frontal cortex and takes attention away from the current goal. We often notice reduced productivity when there is re-organisation pending – or a takeover expected.

In a fast-changing business environment, it’s very easy for people to begin to feel uncertain about the future, so this is an area where leaders can make a big difference with very little effort. Set out your plans for the year, establish a routine and keep your team informed.

Autonomy

Not everyone has complete autonomy at work so what is important here is the perception of having control over events. It’s also worth noting that working as part of a team significantly reduces the perception of autonomy and can raise stress levels quite dramatically.

Research shows a clear correlation between a person’s health and their perception of autonomy. But how do you create that perception of autonomy in a large organisation?

Wherever possible, give individuals discretion at the point of decision-making. Define areas where each person’s own judgement is required. Nothing undermines that sense of autonomy faster than having to refer every decision to your boss – even worse – a committee! Build individual decision-making into your organisational processes and avoid lengthy procedures that require the approval of multiple levels of management.

…and employ people whose judgement you can trust!

Relatedness

At work, the idea of relatedness means a sense of safety with others and the need for safe human contact is a primary driver similar to the need for food. The sense of relatedness is easily lost when meeting new people or when someone you know excludes you from a meeting or discussion or chooses not to confide in you over an important matter.

To avoid triggering the threat response in your people, as a leader it’s important not only for them to feel safe with each other, but also with you as their boss.

Fortunately, this sense of safety is easy to generate. It comes from creating rapport (NLP Practitioners take a bow), which can be done verbally or non-verbally. Shaking hands, using a person’s name, chatting about non-work interests are common ways of creating rapport. Deeper levels of rapport can be achieved through high quality attention and matching patterns of language and behaviour.

Teams of people who know each other well enjoy a strong sense of relatedness and this can significantly enhance performance by triggering the ‘reward’ response that makes good use of cognitive abilities.

As a leader, you can also create a greater sense of relatedness – to you – in your team through coaching and mentoring and one-to-one meetings.

Fairness

At work, fairness – or its absence – is noticed in many different ways. Is there a ‘fair exchange’ between individuals, between leader and team, between organisation and employee, between customer and supplier?

If something seems unfair, it rapidly triggers intense emotions and the ‘threat’ response. It uses up a lot of mental energy and distracts from everything else.

Each individual person has their own view of what is fair, but most people are also open to seeing a different version of fairness if it can be explained fully. (Here’s where the NLP concept of perceptual positions and techniques such as the Meta-Mirror are useful).

As a leader, it’s worth taking time to explain contentious decisions and processes that seem unfair. As you talk people through the issues and the thought process you not only restore their sense of fairness, you also increase their status and feeling of relatedness at the same time, triggering a powerful ‘reward’ response in the face of what could have been seen as a threatening situation.

Remember, these reactions are hard-wired into the brain and are not the result of conscious choices. An emotionally intelligent, self-aware adult will have some capacity to suppress or manage the ‘threat’ response and generate their own ‘reward’ state. But can you count on everyone in your team having that level of emotional intelligence and self-awareness?

Isn’t it part of your responsibility as a leader to create the conditions where it’s easy for each person to perform at their best?

Your Personal SCARF Inventory

Having read this article you no doubt have some ideas about how this model can shed light on the behaviour of people around you and help you lead your team more effectively. To aid you in formulating your thoughts, I’ve created a downloadable grid, which you can use in a variety of ways.

For instant access to your Personal SCARF Inventory, click the button below and enter your details on the next page…

Staying motivated

Set some goals recently? Started a new project? Maybe you are now some months into the project and are at the stage of reviewing your progress towards your goal.  I hope you are succeeding.

If not, then staying motivated is a key piece of the puzzle.  Sometimes we might not like the tasks involved with achievement of the goal and so it's easy to become distracted by tasks we like better and then the further behind we fall, the less motivated we become.

Motivation is a renewable resource.  It's not enough to feel motivated at the start of a project; you have to top it up on a regular basis, digging deep through exhaustion or boredom.  Zig Ziglar said:

"People often say that motivation doesn't last.  Well, neither does bathing – that's why we recommend it daily."

Here are 5 simple ways to help you stay motivated and achieve your goals:

1. Start specific

"Win more clients" "Get more done around the house" "Exercise more" etc just don't cut it.  Make your goal quantifiable so you can track your progress e.g. "Win 6 new clients spending at least £1000 each by end August", "Attend 3 aerobics classes at the gym each week"

If you’ve spent time looking at or working with NLP, then you’ll know the importance of setting well-formed outcomes.  It makes the process of staying motivated so much easier.

Once you have your well-formed outcome write it down somewhere you'll look regularly.

2. Remember why you're doing it

Write a list of all the great reasons why you're doing this; the benefits it will bring and what the end result will look, feel and sound like:

  • Earn a bigger bonus so we can have a better holiday
  • Show my colleagues that I can compete
  • Earn the respect of my boss
  • Make new contacts which will lead to even bigger things
  • Put me in a good position for promotion next year
  • Improve my self esteem

Cover all the angles – that way, when you're struggling to crack on one day or you feel yourself starting to flag, something on the list should give you the necessary boost to take action. 

3. Have fun

If you view the activities associated with your goal or project as 'just another chore' or find them boring and stressful then it is going to be hard to keep motivated!  Find ways to make the tasks more interesting or, dare I say it, fun! Fun is different for each of us so think of little things that will make tasks enjoyable.

4. Try something different

If you're feeling less than motivated and don't seem to be making progress at the rate you'd like, take a moment to look at the whole task.  You might be doing things correctly and efficiently but sometimes that approach isn't the most motivating and so it slows down your progress or just makes it feel like a duty or a responsibility.  Consider whether you could use a different approach – it doesn't mean you're giving up, just looking for a better way.  Keep trying different approaches until you find the one that keeps you motivated and achieves the results you want.

5. Create, track and celebrate achievement of smaller goals or milestones

Smaller goals and milestones act like stepping stones making a big goal seem easier to achieve.  They give you a plan of action and a more frequent sense of achievement as you reach each one.  Make sure you monitor progress so you don't miss out on the buzz of achievement and think about ways to celebrate or reward each step of the journey.

 

Written by Debbie Stone, Associate Partner at Brilliant Minds

Hope is not a strategy

How many times have you heard someone begin a sentence with, “Hopefully…”?

If it’s a simple case of, “Hopefully it won’t rain on our garden party” that’s one thing.  When it’s something like, “Hopefully the sales figures will be better next month” or “Hopefully the Project Managers will see the importance of this and give it priority “ or “Hopefully the work will be done in time” – that’s quite another!

Have you noticed that most often the thing people hope for is the co-operation of others.  They hope the new product is a success (customers will buy it).  They hope the two departments collaborate successfully (people work with each other).  They hope the new initiative makes a difference (people buy into the idea).

The problem is, if your outcome depends on other people to take action in a specific way, hope is not enough.

As one of my business mentors used to say, “Hope is not a strategy”.

If you require specific people to do specific things, you need a specific strategy.  Of course, some people doubt their ability to motivate others to take action.  Some people think they might be lucky and people will do as they ask.  But how many people actually formulate a plan that will result in people doing exactly what is needed?

If you’re not one of them, you’re missing out. 

Human behaviour has a structure.  Motivation has a structure.  Communication has a structure.  And once you understand that structure, you can plan communications that will motivate people to take action in a very precise way.

Now that’s a strategy!

Performance Ratings – and why they hamper performance

Many years ago when I earned one of my professional qualifications I completed a project on performance appraisal systems.  At that time, in the organisation I served performance appraisal had three clear purposes:

  1. Formal, recorded, quality communication between a manager and one of their direct reports about their performance, development and opportunities.
  2. Quality information for the Training department to help prioritise development activities across the organisation.
  3. Agreement of goals and targets for the coming year.

Overall, the performance appraisal system contributed to continuous improvement in performance and business results.

The emphasis – back then – was on the quality of the discussion between the employee and his or her manager and the record that enabled the Training department to respond to the needs of the business.  Quality.  Quality.  Quality.

All discussion related to pay, bonuses and promotions was done at a different time of year.

Some years later performance-related pay was introduced to the organisation.  Now we had to give numerical values to performance.  Goals and targets had to be expressed in a particular way.  Performance appraisals took on a new tone.  The focus was on the performance rating and everything else faded in to the background.  The quality of records of appraisals dropped dramatically. 

At the time I thought that maybe the reason why this new approach seemed less useful must be that we’d failed to implement it in the right way.  My career moved on and I didn’t revisit the subject for some time.

The next time I came up close with an organisation’s performance management system I realised that common practice (not necessarily, in my opinion, best practice) had changed dramatically.  Most of my client organisations operated a performance management system that relied on a performance rating, given once per year, upon which an employee’s pay, bonus and opportunities depended.

Usually, when the subject arose, it was because people were complaining to me, an outsider, about the unfairness of the system.

On asking questions I discovered several aspects of common practice that continue to amaze me.  I simply can’t see why anyone would think these are good ways to foster high performance. Or indeed, any kind of performance.

  1. The Five-Point Scale

Most rating systems use a five-point scale.  A score of 5 indicates a superstar, a score of 1 indicates someone is not delivering.  In reality, most managers will want to give scores of 3, 4 or 5.  After all, if I score a member of my team as a 1 or 2, it’s a bit like saying I’m not doing a good job of managing that person, isn’t it?

  1. The Bell Curve

To counteract this tendency to score everyone average or above, lots of organisations have adopted a system of forced ranking.  Each manager MUST use all five scores.  Pressed as to why, the owners of the system will mutter about ‘the Bell curve’ and ‘normal distribution’.  This is usually based on incomplete understanding and lack of consideration of the consequences of their actions.

Firstly, to insist that all managers must use all five ratings, is to presuppose that it’s impossible for every person in a team to be performing brilliantly.  If, as an organisation, you want everyone to perform brilliantly, doesn’t it seem somewhat counter-productive to work on the assumption that the thing you want is impossible? 

After all, the first rule of goal-setting is that you have to believe it’s possible to get your goal!

Yes, we know that if you were to plot (using some completely fair measurement!) the performance of everyone in the organisation on a chart, it would be likely to show a normal distribution – a Bell Curve.  But if you looked at the distribution of individual teams you’d be more likely to find them in clusters.  Why?  Because one of the most significant factors in the performance of an individual is their boss. 

So, to get good performance from all your employees, it makes sense that all the managers must be motivated to do a good job too.

How could forced ranking motivate a manager to get the best out of every person in their team?  Knowing that even if everyone did a fantastic job, some of them would have to be given a low performance rating?

  1. Peer Review

Recognising that the forced ranking system had limitations, the experts than introduced a process of peer review.  The principle being that managers may not be totally objective about their own people and that some employees may have taken on more challenging goals than others, so let’s get together all the managers at one level and compare notes.  This group of managers can then agree who are the real star performers and who are the low performers – not exceeding the quotas for each rank, of course.

The reality of peer review as I’ve seen it is painful for all concerned.  In large organisations most managers have a big enough challenge keeping up to date with the activities of their own team members, without having to know something about everyone else. So the eventual ratings are determined by each manager’s ability to ‘sell’ the achievements of his people to the other managers, all of whom are determined to ‘get a good deal’ for their own people.

If you think about it logically, if you can’t be sure that managers will be objective or fair about performance ratings for their own team, why would you expect them to be able to be objective and fair about ratings for an even bigger group that includes their own team?

So what are the alternatives?

My view of this is quite simple.  Let the managers manage.

Why not have a scale that assumes everyone is doing at least an adequate job.  If they weren’t you’d already be doing something about it, wouldn’t you?

If, as an organisation you have a budget allocation for salaries, salary increases and bonuses, why not refer that allocation to heads of departments, who can then allocate it to senior managers, who pass on a share to each of their managers and so on.

Decisions about how that money is distributed between individual members of a team would then be a joint decision between the line manager, their manager and a representative of HR.

Would it be fair?  Maybe not entirely, but as far as I can tell the present systems used in most organisations aren’t fair.  Would it motivate the managers?  Possibly, and at least it wouldn’t de-motivate them the way a lot of systems do.  There is little more disheartening for a manager than to have to tell an employee they have received a performance rating lower than they deserve and hence a smaller bonus. Or worse still, to have to invent a justification for a low performance rating.

The way the pay increases and bonuses were distributed would, ultimately, reflect the leadership styles of the managers concerned.  Since people have a choice to work for a particular manager or not, it’s likely that they would feel comfortable with their own manager’s way of working it out.

The way I see this, rating people on a five point scale, demanding that all managers use all ratings and then trying to achieve a balance across a department by having the managers fight it out is leaving out of the equation a very important factor.  Personal judgement.

If you don’t trust your managers to know their own people and judge who deserves what in terms of pay, bonus and opportunities, then no performance management system can plug that gap.  And if you do trust your managers to manage, why not let them get on with it?

Phobias at Work

Most people have heard the term ‘phobia’ and most have an idea of its meaning. In conversational usage, it refers to an extreme, and usually irrational, fear. Common phobias include fear of heights, spiders, moths, closed-in places, open spaces, lifts, flying and snakes.

For most purposes, phobias are regarded as irrational fears. There are various forms of help and support, treatment and de-sensitisation available. For example, if you are afraid of flying there are short courses available which offer lots of information to allay your fears and then take you for a short flight to prove that you can do it.

I’m told that such courses have a success rate of over 90%. Brilliant! 

The remaining 1-10% is made up of the people who have a phobia of flying as opposed to an irrational fear. There is a difference:

An irrational fear is a mental construct. A person creates anxiety by thinking about the thing they fear and can work it up into a major problem, but faced with the actual situation they can be reasoned out of their fear and encouraged to face the thing they feared.

A phobia is a neurological connection between the thing that is feared and an intense state of fear. It triggers the fight/flight response and cannot be reasoned away. In fact, the more the person attempts to face their fear, the worse the response may become.

When someone is on the grip of a phobic response they have no choice about their behaviour and cannot easily shake off the fear. Someone with an irrational fear is likely to be able to suppress their emotions or hide them from others.

When people encounter someone with a phobia they may treat them with anything from total derision to sympathetic concern.  Neither of which makes any difference to the experience of the sufferer! However, it can be very uncomfortable after the event to realise that you have displayed your fear of something others do not find even slightly unnerving.

Working with phobias has traditionally been a clinical process. Traditional desensitisation therapy can take anything up to 2 years of weekly sessions to completely dissolve the phobia. People would only seek help for a phobia when it became completely debilitating and most people simply learned to live with it.

For example, the music teacher who had agoraphobia built himself a comfortable life at home. His pupils came to his house for their lessons and no-one ever suspected that he was afraid to go outside.

The businessman who suffered from claustrophobia chose a car with large windows and drove himself everywhere. If he had to take a train he’d make sure it was a quiet time when he travelled and he never used the London Underground.

But what happens when a person can no longer ‘work around’ their phobia? What if the thing they fear suddenly becomes a part of their daily life? Or their working life?

This can happen when a company re-locates. Employees who have been working at ground level might be re-located to a high-rise building and suddenly find that their phobia of taking a lift has become a big issue. Walking up three flights of stairs is easy. Walking up twenty-three flights is not so easy – and takes a lot more time!

Not many companies have any specific provision for dealing with phobias. They are probably covered by Occupational Health policies, but that often requires a person to volunteer for therapy – a thing many people are embarrassed to do.

In fact, a phobia does not require therapy in the traditional sense. It’s not an indication of any kind of mental health issue or instability. It’s a demonstration of the person’s brain’s fantastic ability to learn quickly:

A phobia is an example of ‘one-trial learning’. That means it is learned on the basis of one experience. Something happens once and the phobia is created and never forgotten.

How many other things in life can you say you learned on the basis of one experience and have never forgotten?

So if you have a phobia it’s a good sign that you learn easily.

Even knowing that, you’d probably still prefer not to have the phobia. Or would you?

One of the indicators that can be used to distinguish between an irrational fear and a full-on phobia is the degree of motivation to overcome the problem. A person with a phobia is usually so scared of the thing they’re scared of they’re also scared that if they lose the phobia they’ll get hurt. Added to which, some people have heard about desensitisation therapies and they’re terrified that in order to dissolve the phobia they’ll have to face the thing they’re phobic about. 

This is obviously very stressful and so most people would rather live with the phobia and work around it.

Until that’s no longer possible.

The NLP Phobia model does not use the desensitisation principle. It is based on the understanding that a phobia is a learned response. The first step is to discover when this learning was acquired. Not surprisingly, it’s often in early childhood. Often the child learns to fear a certain thing because a parent does.

For example, a lot of small children spend a lot of time exploring the floor – it’s the main thing they can access easily. At some point a child may encounter a spider for the first time. ‘Look Mummy!’ he exclaims, excited at his new discovery. If ‘Mummy’ has a spider phobia she’s probably going to scream, snatch him up and run away.

This is not only frightening for the child – he’s not used to seeing Mummy scared – it also imprints a powerful message: the spider is to be feared. Not surprising then, the next time he encounters a spider he screams and runs away.

The process of uncovering the point of learning is simple, and even if the person with the phobia has no conscious memory of that point of learning, there are methods to access the unconscious memory.

Once we have located the incident where the phobia was learned, we scramble the memory in a systematic fashion to break the neurological connection between the trigger (the spider, the lift, the snake etc) and the state of fear. The sufferer does not have to re-live the memory or face their fear at any point in the process.

This process takes – on average – about 40 minutes. So, in one session a person can be released from their phobia permanently. Sounds incredible? The reason a phobia can be dissolved so quickly is that it is a discrete piece of mental programming. It usually stands alone and does not have many connections to other behavioural patterns that could hold it in place.

However, some phobias create a kind of ‘background programme’ that is constantly on the alert for the thing that scares the person. Someone who is scared of spiders may involuntarily scan every room they enter to check there are no spiders. A person with claustrophobia may regularly check to see they have enough space.

With the phobia gone, this background programme is redundant. It stops. And that frees up mental (and physical) energy for other pursuits.

This alone is a good reason to get help for a phobia. Many people live with a phobia but don’t realise how much energy it consumes and how much their quality of life will improve without the phobia. Some people, however, have a greater need to address their phobias, like those whose employer is about to relocate them to the 26th floor of a new building.

With proper help, that move could really be the start of a new way of life!

[If you have a phobia and you’d like some help to get rid of it, please get in touch]

How to make good choices

The modern world presents us with constant minor decisions to be made  from choosing one TV channel out of about 200, ordering a coffee (latte, cappuccino, Americano, whole milk, skimmed, soya, decaff, extra shot, syrups, extra hot, wet, etc) or a tea (English breakfast, Earl or Lady Grey, chamomile, peppermint, fruit or builder’s) to the number of options when buying a train ticket as well as the more traditional major ones:  to buy or to rent, whether to take that new job or stay where they know you, which car to buy, who to spend the rest of your life with (or whether to spend the rest of your life with them).

We’re bombarded and many of us feel overwhelmed. It’s not that the decisions are particularly tricky it’s more the sheer volume and the pressure to decide right there and then. When you’ve had a tough day at work, making frequent decisions, even simple choices, like what to have for dinner seem challenging.

Deliberating over every minor decision – coffee or tea, brown or white, eat in or take away, could be wasting energy. Try asking yourself: “How important is this decision and how much time does it deserve?”

When it’s an important decision, the first choice you need to make is to actually deal with it; stalling doesn’t make the decision making process any easier.

Make sure you give the problem due consideration rather than deciding on the spur of the moment. Remember, these decisions you make today can result in consequences that may impact on the rest of your life. You owe it to yourself to listen to both your head and your heart. Set yourself a deadline for collecting all the information and making the decision.

That doesn’t mean you should spend hours, days or weeks agonising over it, writing long lists of pros and cons, asking the world and his wife for their opinions. I’ve read research that shows that spending less time consciously thinking about a problem and allowing our unconscious minds to work on it can pay dividends. I’ve certainly applied this to certain work related tasks; when I’m designing training I find it helps to spend some time actively thinking about it and then “forget” about it for a while. I give myself a deadline and frequently, quite well-formed ideas have popped into my head before the deadline.

Our minds can only consciously process a limited amount of information at a time and this makes it difficult to weigh up several factors at once. But our unconscious capacity to process information is almost unlimited which gives rise to the suggestion that unconscious thought is far more effective than logical, rational, conscious reasoning. You won’t necessarily know why you’ve reached a decision but chances are it’ll be the right one for you.

Other people will try to rush you for a decision or try to make your decisions for you but you’re the one who’ll have to live with the consequences so be firm about how much time you need.

You can probably eliminate the obvious “non-options” quite quickly, leaving your brain fewer options and ideas to mull over.

If all else fails and you’re left with a choice between two seemingly equal options, toss a coin and notice how you react to the result. Disappointed? Chances are you were favouring the other option all along.

When things don’t go according to plan, remember that you made the best choice on the information that was available at the time.  Indulging in too much hindsight can be bad for the soul.

Written by Debbie Stone, Associate Partner at Brilliant Minds

Scenes from the MAC/PC debate

I’ve already written a few times about the metaprogramme of Options and Procedures.  If you were asked which computing style – MAC or PC was more ‘options’ oriented and which more ‘procedures’ oriented I think you would come to an opinion quite quickly.

I also think that most people would choose MAC as the more options oriented style and PC as more procedural.

So now, let’s turn to the experience of buying MAC and PC:

The Apple store

You go to buy a MAC.  Or it could be a MacBook, an iPAD, an iPhone, anything that Apple produce.  You enter the store and you’re greeted by a member of staff.  Sometimes several members of staff converge on you at once – there are so many of them! (If you’re my age, you do your best not to be put off by the fact that the staff seem to have an average age of about 14).  Said member of staff quickly discovers what you want to buy and gets you lined up to talk to someone about your requirements.  They have an efficient system for pin-pointing the right product for you, taking your payment and delivering your goods.

You leave the store with your new purchase and a vague feeling of having been ‘processed’.

The PC store

You go to buy a PC.  (Or a laptop or tablet).  You enter the store and wander around looking for the kind of PC that interests you.  There are no staff to be seen.  Eventually you form an opinion of what you want to buy.  You look around for a member of staff.  There’s one on the Apple department who quickly makes it plain that he can’t help.  (He may suggest you buy a MAC instead) After some serious searching you eventually find a member of staff who is able to find a second member of staff who knows who can help you.  You may or may not find exactly what you want.  They may or may not have it in stock.  You may or may not buy it today.

You leave the store with or without your new PC and vague feeling of dissatisfaction.

NOW – tell me, which is more procedural?

Breaking the Lateness Habit

[Written by Debbie Stone, Associate Partner at Brilliant Minds]

It doesn't matter where you're going, you're always late.  Always. You spend your life dashing about, risking a speeding fine, and still you arrive 10 minutes late, out of breath and full of apologies.

Was the saying 'late for your own funeral' invented for you?  Do you find it hard to imagine arriving at a meeting relaxed, calm and breathing normally?

If so, you're not alone. A significant number of people – some estimates say up to 15 or 20 percent – have trouble arriving on time.

Do you need an incentive to break the habit?

Habitual lateness won't help your career prospects nor will it create great workplace relationships. For one thing, your boss and colleagues are relying on you to be at work when you're scheduled to arrive; you don't want to disappoint them. If your chronic tardiness bothers you, think how much it infuriates others who are constantly wasting their time waiting for you.

Just because nobody confronts you about your tardiness, that doesn't mean that no one's watching the clock and forming an opinion about you or your work ethic.  These judgments can damage you when it comes to performance reviews and promotions.  Those few extra minutes of sleep or squeezing in that extra task could cost you your reputation – or worse, your job. 

"Look at the costs of being late and the payoffs of being on time," says Julie Morgenstern, author of 'Time Management From the Inside Out.' "I think people's stress level is very high when they're late. They're racing, worried, and anxious. They spend the first few minutes apologizing. One of the payoffs of being on time is that you eliminate the stress of the travel time and you eliminate the time spent apologizing."

So for everyone who's ever felt punctuality-challenged, or for those who have loved ones who are constantly showing up late, here are ten strategies and tips you can use to kick the lateness habit and start showing up on time (and please forward this article to all of your friends and family who could use a few lessons on being on time). 

1. Identify why you're chronically late. Reasons for being late run from legitimate (the motorway's closed) to procrastination (you didn't prepare for the meeting ahead of time and instead tried to do it that morning) to pure feet dragging (you're unhappy at work and simply take your time showing up). Address the underlying cause of your lateness, whether it's dealing with procrastination, finding a more enjoyable career, or learning how to better estimate how long things take. 

2. Learn to say no. Perhaps you would normally be on time, but at the last second your neighbour, mother, friend or colleague asks you for a favour that throws your entire schedule off track. Realise that it's sometimes OK to simply say, "Sorry, I don't have the time right now, but I can help you with that another time."

3. Be realistic about how much time you need. It may be that you're late because you underestimate how much time things take. To get a better handle on this, keep a journal for a week or two and write down how long things (such as personal grooming, the daily commute, dog walking, or grocery shopping) take. Then, you'll know if you're trying to fit too much into one day.

4. Leave some "margin" in your life.  Add in a few minutes in between events for those unforeseen occurrences in life … which tend to be the rule, not the exception.

5. Develop consequences. Sometimes consequences of being late come whether you like it or not, such as not getting a job because you were late to the interview. However, in other cases, developing a negative consequence to arriving late can help curb the behaviour in the future. If you're late for a lunch meeting, offer to pay.  A few occurrences of this and you'll soon have another motivation for being on time.

6. Stick to your "leave-by" time. Most people have a time in their head when they know they must leave the door by to make their appointment on time. Once you decide on this time, stick to it no matter what (no last-minute phone calls or errands allowed).

7. Place your alarm clock strategically so that you have to get out of bed to turn it off.  You're much less likely to hit the snooze button. If you really can't bear to get up when they alarm first goes off, then set 2 separate alarms 5 minutes apart.

8. Invest in a water resistant watch and wear it in the shower or make sure there's a clock in the bathroom.

I was chatting to someone about lateness at a recent conference.  She said she was often late for meetings and even workshops with clients, but didn't know what to do.  Looking at her arms, I made the observation that she doesn't wear a watch.

'Oh,' she exclaimed, somewhat surprised 'do you think it would help?'  Amazing.

9. Silence is golden.  Breakfast TV or your favourite radio station just act as a distraction when you're getting ready in the morning – leave them in the off position.  On mornings when I have to leave early, I use this strategy and I reckon it saves me a good 10 minutes.

10. Keep your car's fuel tank half-full.  It's so annoying when you're already pushed for time, you jump in the car and then realise you need to fill up with fuel on the way.  Make a promise to yourself that you'll always fill up as soon as the needle dips below halfway.

Use one of two of these tips tomorrow.  Persist with them and soon you'll be developing the Punctuality Habit, feeling less stressed, building better relationships with those around you and making time to do things you never could before.

I DID IT

The words leaped off the screen as soon as I opened the email.  ‘Shaun Mansfield, you are a star!’ I thought. Who is Shaun Mansfield and what did he do?

Well, you may or may not remember last year in the run up to the launch of our ‘How to be a Brilliant Coach’ programme I hosted a number of free conference coaching calls.  People dialled in and asked for coaching; I gave mini coaching sessions to 3-4 people each time.

Shaun dialled in and asked if I could help with his fear of heights.  Correction: phobia about heights. I told him I could and we started talking. It turned out that he’d signed up to do a charity abseil and was terrified at the thought of what he would have to do.

As the conversation unfolded I discovered that this was not just any old charity abseil.  This was abseiling from the top of the BT Tower in London.  No wonder he was nervous!

Live on the call, I started taking Shaun through the NLP Phobia Model.  I’d got to the point of discovering the root cause when my coach’s instinct told me not to attempt the whole process there and then.  Instead I arranged a coaching session in person with Shaun as my contribution to his fund-raising. 

The day we met, his abseil was only weeks away.  I was excited to see the results of our work in such dramatic fashion.  Shaun was simply relieved that he wasn’t going to be embarrassed on the day.

Then disaster struck. The event was postponed because of security issues in London. 

In fact, it was postponed until 10th March 2014.  What a long wait that was!

The next day I emailed Shaun to find out how he did, and this is his reply:

“Hi Dianne,
Forgive me for not getting in touch straight away.
However, I have an excuse; I did not do the abseil Monday.
It was far too windy.
So I had a day of sitting around thinking I was going to abseil.
Went back to London yesterday and did it!
Managed to step off without any trouble, had a slight technical hitch which meant I was stuck right at the top of the tower.
I cannot say I enjoyed it.
However
I DID IT
Which without your help would have been impossible.
Thank you, thank you thank you.
Shaun"

As I said at the beginning, Shaun Mansfield – you are a star!  What a privilege it was to have been part of this story.